Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dearman v. Rhodengreen2 sentences2009In order to change custody from one parent to the other, "[t]here must be a showing that the party to whom custody was originally awarded is no longer able or suited to retain custody or that the conditions and circumstances surrounding the child have so changed that the welfare of the child would be enhanced by modifying the original judgment." [Cit.] Dearman v. Rhoden, 235 Ga. 457, 458 (3), 219 S.E.2d 704 (1975) (emphasis in original), overruled on other grounds, Matthews v. Matthews, 238 Ga. 201 , 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977). [2] NOTES [1] The first opportunity to challenge the juvenile court orde 2009In order to change custody from one parent to the other, "[t]here must be a showing that the party to whom custody was originally awarded is no longer able or suited to retain custody or that the conditions and circumstances surrounding the child have so changed that the welfare of the child would be enhanced by modifying the original judgment." [Cit.] Dearman v. Rhoden, 235 Ga. 457, 458 (3), 219 S.E.2d 704 (1975) (emphasis in original), overruled on other grounds, Matthews v. Matthews, 238 Ga. 201 , 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977). [2] NOTES [1] The first opportunity to challenge the juvenile court orde | 1 | 1 |
Price v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Price v. State, 228 Ga. App. 155, 156 (1) ( 491 SE2d 210 ) (1997). 1999Price v. State, 228 Ga. App. 155, 156 (1) ( 491 SE2d 210 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. ARAGUEL, SANDERS, &C.green2 sentences1984It can be argued . . . that this [was] the first opportunity for a hearing, but the recent changes in the workers’ compensation law do not require a hearing for the beginning of payments but require the employer/insurer to begin payments immediately unless controverted without an award under [OCGA § 34-9-221]; and a notice to controvert must be filed with the board within 60 days of the due date of the first payment of compensation ‘except upon the grounds of change in condition or newly discovered evidence.’ ” Anderson v. Araguel, Sanders &c., 163 Ga. App. 610, 612 ( 295 SE2d 750 ). 1984It can be argued . . . that this [was] the first opportunity for a hearing, but the recent changes in the workers’ compensation law do not require a hearing for the beginning of payments but require the employer/insurer to begin payments immediately unless controverted without an award under [OCGA § 34-9-221]; and a notice to controvert must be filed with the board within 60 days of the due date of the first payment of compensation ‘except upon the grounds of change in condition or newly discovered evidence.’ ” Anderson v. Araguel, Sanders &c., 163 Ga. App. 610, 612 ( 295 SE2d 750 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2012“A constitutional attack on a sentencing statute, unlike a statute under which a criminal defendant is prosecuted, may be made after the guilty verdict is returned, as the first opportunity to challenge such a statute does not occur until after that time. [Cit.]” Jones v. State, 290 Ga. 670 (3) ( 725 SE2d 236 ) (2012). 2012“A constitutional attack on a sentencing statute, unlike a statute under which a criminal defendant is prosecuted, may be made after the guilty verdict is returned, as the first opportunity to challenge such a statute does not occur until after that time. [Cit.]” Jones v. State, 290 Ga. 670 (3) ( 725 SE2d 236 ) (2012). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Woods v. State
green
2 sentences2012Woods v. State, 279 Ga. 28 -29 (1) ( 608 SE2d 631 ) (2005). 2012Woods v. State, 279 Ga. 28 -29 (1) ( 608 SE2d 631 ) (2005). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Matthews v. Matthews
green
2 sentences2009In order to change custody from one parent to the other, "[t]here must be a showing that the party to whom custody was originally awarded is no longer able or suited to retain custody or that the conditions and circumstances surrounding the child have so changed that the welfare of the child would be enhanced by modifying the original judgment." [Cit.] Dearman v. Rhoden, 235 Ga. 457, 458 (3), 219 S.E.2d 704 (1975) (emphasis in original), overruled on other grounds, Matthews v. Matthews, 238 Ga. 201 , 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977). [2] NOTES [1] The first opportunity to challenge the juvenile court orde 2009In order to change custody from one parent to the other, "[t]here must be a showing that the party to whom custody was originally awarded is no longer able or suited to retain custody or that the conditions and circumstances surrounding the child have so changed that the welfare of the child would be enhanced by modifying the original judgment." [Cit.] Dearman v. Rhoden, 235 Ga. 457, 458 (3), 219 S.E.2d 704 (1975) (emphasis in original), overruled on other grounds, Matthews v. Matthews, 238 Ga. 201 , 232 S.E.2d 76 (1977). [2] NOTES [1] The first opportunity to challenge the juvenile court orde | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.