Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1902–1973 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Stategreen2 sentences1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. 1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. | 1 | 1 |
Biggers v. Stategreen2 sentences1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. 1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lovett v. State
green
2 sentences1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. 1973Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105, 106 ( 34 SE 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) ( 70 SE 989 ), as well as the wider view expressed in Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404, 405 ( 20 SE2d 433 ), to-wit: that in a homicide the important issue is the identification of the person and not the identification of the name. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Canal Insurance Co. v. Tate
green
2 sentences1969Co. v. Tate, 111 Ga. App. 377 ( 141 SE2d 851 ) which holds that such proof does not demand a finding of the same identity), this proof would only apply in reference to the signed statement of the plaintiff where the party named Hill was inserted in a form. 1969Co. v. Tate, 111 Ga. App. 377 ( 141 SE2d 851 ) which holds that such proof does not demand a finding of the same identity), this proof would only apply in reference to the signed statement of the plaintiff where the party named Hill was inserted in a form. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Webb v. State
green
2 sentences1967Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, .and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling'is immaterial.” Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 SE 630 ). 1967Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, .and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling'is immaterial.” Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 SE 630 ). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Roland v. State
green
2 sentences1919Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling is immaterial. 29 Cyc. 72; Words and Phrases (2d S.) 928; Roland v. State, 127 Ga. 401 ( 56 S. E. 412 ), et cit.; Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), et cit. 2. 1919Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling is immaterial. 29 Cyc. 72; Words and Phrases (2d S.) 928; Roland v. State, 127 Ga. 401 ( 56 S. E. 412 ), et cit.; Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), et cit. 2. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Watkins v. State
neutral
2 sentences1919Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling is immaterial. 29 Cyc. 72; Words and Phrases (2d S.) 928; Roland v. State, 127 Ga. 401 ( 56 S. E. 412 ), et cit.; Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), et cit. 2. 1919Great latitude is allowed in the spelling and pronunciation of proper names, and in all legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal, if two names, as commonly pronounced in the English language, are sounded alike, a variance in their spelling is immaterial. 29 Cyc. 72; Words and Phrases (2d S.) 928; Roland v. State, 127 Ga. 401 ( 56 S. E. 412 ), et cit.; Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), et cit. 2. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
State v. Blankenship
neutral
1 sentence1902State v. Blankenship, 21 Mo. 504 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.