5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
DEBELBOT v. THE STATE (Two Cases)green2 sentences2026Cf. Debelbot v. State, 308 Ga. 165, 169 (2020) (mischaracterization of reasonable doubt standard was “uniquely harmful” because the 17 case was almost entirely circumstantial and two individuals had the opportunity to inflict the trauma that led to the death). 2026Cf. Debelbot v. State, 308 Ga. 165, 169 (2020) (mischaracterization of reasonable doubt standard was “uniquely harmful” because the 17 case was almost entirely circumstantial and two individuals had the opportunity to inflict the trauma that led to the death). | 2 | 2 |
Roberts v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Because an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal, see Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 ( 690 SE2d 150 ) (2010), we dismissed Bussey’s appeal. 2020Because an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal, see Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 ( 690 SE2d 150 ) (2010), we dismissed Bussey’s appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Bank of North Georgia v. Windermere Development, Inc.green2 sentences2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu 2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu | 1 | 1 |
3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bankgreen2 sentences2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu 2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu | 1 | 1 |
Iwan Renovations, Inc. v. North Atlanta National Bankgreen2 sentences2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu 2014C., Inc. v. Free,15 this court barred suit upon a promissory note as an impermissible claim for a deficiency judgment.16 There, a buyer of certain real estate executed two separate promissory notes in favor of the sellers.17 One note, 11 Iwan Renovations, supra at 128 (1) (citation and footnote omitted; emphasis supplied). 12 Id. (citation and footnote omitted). 13 Id.; see 3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank, 316 Ga. App. 796, 800 ( 728 SE2d 843 ) (2012); Bank of North Ga. v. Windermere Dev., 316 Ga. App. 33, 38 (1) ( 728 SE2d 714 ) (2012). 14 3 West Investments, LLC, supra (punctu | 1 | 1 |
State v. Russellgreen2 sentences1989In State v. Russell, 256 Ga. 503 (2) ( 350 SE2d 430 ) (1986), the Georgia Supreme Court found that OCGA § 16-8-19 (b) created an impermissible presumption regarding intent, and was therefore invalid. 1989In State v. Russell, 256 Ga. 503 (2) ( 350 SE2d 430 ) (1986), the Georgia Supreme Court found that OCGA § 16-8-19 (b) created an impermissible presumption regarding intent, and was therefore invalid. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.