Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1965–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jennings v. McIntosh County Board of Commissionersgreen2 sentences2017Compare Jennings v. McIntosh County Bd. of Commrs. , 276 Ga. at 847 (5) n. 7, 583 S.E.2d 839 (reversing but not remanding where trial court did not find that the amount of the requested attorney fees was unreasonable; rather, the only basis of its erroneous partial fee award was that appellant had failed to prevail on all of her claims). 2017Compare Jennings v. McIntosh County Bd. of Commrs. , 276 Ga. at 847 (5) n. 7, 583 S.E.2d 839 (reversing but not remanding where trial court did not find that the amount of the requested attorney fees was unreasonable; rather, the only basis of its erroneous partial fee award was that appellant had failed to prevail on all of her claims). | 2 | 2 |
Kimmel v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Kimmel v. State, 261 Ga. 332, 334 (3) ( 404 SE2d 436 ) (1991). 2. 1999See Kimmel v. State, 261 Ga. 332, 334 (3) ( 404 SE2d 436 ) (1991). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Whiteway Neon-Ad., Inc. v. Maddoxgreen2 sentences1965Whiteway Neon-Ad., Inc. v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 915, 916 (1) (89 SE2d 650); Bridges v. Avery & Sons Co., 86 Ga. App. 9 (2) ( 70 SE2d 550 ). 1965Whiteway Neon-Ad., Inc. v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 915, 916 (1) (89 SE2d 650); Bridges v. Avery & Sons Co., 86 Ga. App. 9 (2) ( 70 SE2d 550 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hamm v. Willis
green
2 sentences2008“Accordingly, in the absence of either a transcript or an agreed statement of the events at trial, see OCGA § 5-6-41 (f), we must presume the trial judge ruled correctly on all issues presented and that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. [Cits.]” Hamm v. Willis, 201 Ga. App. 723 (1) ( 411 SE2d 771 ) (1991). 2008“Accordingly, in the absence of either a transcript or an agreed statement of the events at trial, see OCGA § 5-6-41 (f), we must presume the trial judge ruled correctly on all issues presented and that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. [Cits.]” Hamm v. Willis, 201 Ga. App. 723 (1) ( 411 SE2d 771 ) (1991). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Bridges v. Avery & Sons Company
neutral
2 sentences1965Whiteway Neon-Ad., Inc. v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 915, 916 (1) (89 SE2d 650); Bridges v. Avery & Sons Co., 86 Ga. App. 9 (2) ( 70 SE2d 550 ). 1965Whiteway Neon-Ad., Inc. v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 915, 916 (1) (89 SE2d 650); Bridges v. Avery & Sons Co., 86 Ga. App. 9 (2) ( 70 SE2d 550 ). | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.