Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jennings Enterprises, Inc. v. Cartegreen2 sentences2000Similarly, a judgment entered in violation of the automatic bankruptcy stay of 11 USC § 362 was “void ab initio, was without effect, and was an absolute nullity.” Jennings Enterprises v. Carte, 224 Ga. App. 538, 540 (1) ( 481 SE2d 541 ) (1997). 2000Similarly, a judgment entered in violation of the automatic bankruptcy stay of 11 USC § 362 was “void ab initio, was without effect, and was an absolute nullity.” Jennings Enterprises v. Carte, 224 Ga. App. 538, 540 (1) ( 481 SE2d 541 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stolte v. Fagan
green
2 sentences2013We affirmed in Stolte v. Fagan, 311 Ga. App. 123 ( 714 SE2d 339 ) (2012). 2013We affirmed in Stolte v. Fagan, 311 Ga. App. 123 ( 714 SE2d 339 ) (2012). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Smith v. Finch
green
2 sentences2009The Supreme Court of Georgia having disapproved a portion of the hindsight charge in Smith v. Finch, 285 Ga. 709 ( 681 SE2d 147 ) (2009), we reverse the judgment entered on the defense verdict. 2009The Supreme Court of Georgia having disapproved a portion of the hindsight charge in Smith v. Finch, 285 Ga. 709 ( 681 SE2d 147 ) (2009), we reverse the judgment entered on the defense verdict. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Palmer v. Bunn
green
2 sentences1968In Palmer v. Bunn, 218 Ga. 244 ( 127 SE2d 372 ), we held that in a custody issue, “A modification of such final order may be made only in another case where it is shown that there have been changes in circumstances affecting the interest and welfare of the children since that final judgment.” Direction is given that the judgment entered on the hearing be vacated and that judgment be entered denying the prayers of both parties. 1968In Palmer v. Bunn, 218 Ga. 244 ( 127 SE2d 372 ), we held that in a custody issue, “A modification of such final order may be made only in another case where it is shown that there have been changes in circumstances affecting the interest and welfare of the children since that final judgment.” Direction is given that the judgment entered on the hearing be vacated and that judgment be entered denying the prayers of both parties. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.