Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1897–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allen v. Sandersgreen2 sentences1987“The elements of fraud are ‘(1) a false representation made by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) an intention to induce [the] plaintiff to act or [to] refrain from acting in reliance thereon; (4) justifiable reliance by the plaintiff; (5) damage to the plaintiff. [Cit.] . . .’ [Cit.]” Allen v. Sanders, 176 Ga. App. 647, 648 (1) ( 337 SE2d 428 ) (1985). 1987“The elements of fraud are ‘(1) a false representation made by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) an intention to induce [the] plaintiff to act or [to] refrain from acting in reliance thereon; (4) justifiable reliance by the plaintiff; (5) damage to the plaintiff. [Cit.] . . .’ [Cit.]” Allen v. Sanders, 176 Ga. App. 647, 648 (1) ( 337 SE2d 428 ) (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Brooks Simmons Co.green2 sentences1977Walker v. Brooks Simmons Co., 44 Ga. App. 470, 473 ( 161 SE 659 ). 1977Walker v. Brooks Simmons Co., 44 Ga. App. 470, 473 ( 161 SE 659 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burch v. Ragan
green
1 sentence1966To construe this contract otherwise, would require nullifi cation of the term “Unamortized balance,” which was obviously intended to have some meaning since the parties could easily have referred to the loan in some manner without incorporating therein its amortization plan, and would do violence to the rule of construction set forth above that, “that construction will be favored which gives meaning and effect to all of the terms of the contract over that which nullifies and renders meaningless a part of the language therein contained.” Burch v. Ragan, 92 Ga. App. 605 , supra. Furthermore, the | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Hamby & Toomer v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.
green
2 sentences1931Co., 127 Ga. 792 ( 56 S. E. 1033 ), the lease contract involved contained a provision expressly reserving to the lessee the privilege of “renewing and extending this contract for a period of three years” from the expiration of the original lease period. 1931Co., 127 Ga. 792 ( 56 S. E. 1033 ), the lease contract involved contained a provision expressly reserving to the lessee the privilege of “renewing and extending this contract for a period of three years” from the expiration of the original lease period. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Willard v. Tayloe
green
1 sentence1897A ruling to the same effect Avas made in the case of Willard v. Tayloe, 75 U. S. 557 . | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Hall v. Center
neutral
1 sentence1897In the case of Hall v. Center, 40 Cal. 63 , it ivas held that equity would decree the specific performance of a coAmnant in a lease Avhich provided that the lessee should have the privilege of purchasing the premises for a fixed sum of money, on or before the expiration of the term. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.