Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1916–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Redd v. Petersgreen2 sentences1980Furthermore, those cases recognized the principles which we have reiterated here; for, as held in one of those cases, Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 320 ( 111 SE2d 132 ): “It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. 1980Furthermore, those cases recognized the principles which we have reiterated here; for, as held in one of those cases, Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 320 ( 111 SE2d 132 ): “It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. | 1 | 1 |
A. E. Speer Incorporated v. McCorveygreen2 sentences1970Speer, Inc. v. McCorvey, 77 Ga. App. 715, 719 ( 49 SE2d 677 ); Ga. Power Co. v. Harwell, 113 Ga. App. 653, 654 , supra. (b) The plaintiff contends that a charge with regard to the measure of damages was error. 1970Speer, Inc. v. McCorvey, 77 Ga. App. 715, 719 ( 49 SE2d 677 ); Ga. Power Co. v. Harwell, 113 Ga. App. 653, 654 , supra. (b) The plaintiff contends that a charge with regard to the measure of damages was error. | 1 | 1 |
Mayor of Savannah v. DuFourgreen2 sentences1959See Mayor &c. of Savannah v. DuFour, 13 Ga. App. 61 ( 78 S. E. 779 ); Western & Atlantic R. v. Dobbs, 36 Ga. App. 516 (4) ( 137 S. E. 407 ). *320 It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. 1959See Mayor &c. of Savannah v. DuFour, 13 Ga. App. 61 ( 78 S. E. 779 ); Western & Atlantic R. v. Dobbs, 36 Ga. App. 516 (4) ( 137 S. E. 407 ). *320 It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Georgia Power Co. v. Harwell
green
1 sentence1970Speer, Inc. v. McCorvey, 77 Ga. App. 715, 719 ( 49 SE2d 677 ); Ga. Power Co. v. Harwell, 113 Ga. App. 653, 654 , supra. (b) The plaintiff contends that a charge with regard to the measure of damages was error. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dobbs
neutral
2 sentences1959See Mayor &c. of Savannah v. DuFour, 13 Ga. App. 61 ( 78 S. E. 779 ); Western & Atlantic R. v. Dobbs, 36 Ga. App. 516 (4) ( 137 S. E. 407 ). *320 It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. 1959See Mayor &c. of Savannah v. DuFour, 13 Ga. App. 61 ( 78 S. E. 779 ); Western & Atlantic R. v. Dobbs, 36 Ga. App. 516 (4) ( 137 S. E. 407 ). *320 It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Furr v. Eddleman
green
2 sentences1950Furr v. Eddleman, 80 Ga. 660 (2) ( 7 S. E. 167 ); Tallulah Falls Ry. 1950Furr v. Eddleman, 80 Ga. 660 (2) ( 7 S. E. 167 ); Tallulah Falls Ry. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Cowdery v. Greenlee
green
2 sentences1916The Supreme Court answered these questions in the affirmative, and held that as to the measure of damages the rule stated-in the ease of Cowdery v. Greenlee, 126 Ga. 786 ( 55 S. E. 918 , 8 L. 1916The Supreme Court answered these questions in the affirmative, and held that as to the measure of damages the rule stated-in the ease of Cowdery v. Greenlee, 126 Ga. 786 ( 55 S. E. 918 , 8 L. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.