Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burrell v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Because there was evidence to support these findings, we must accept them, even if there is evidence to dispute them.4 In light of these findings, the trial court was authorized to conclude, as it did, that a motion to suppress Thompson’s statement would not have been successful. 2 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Diaz v. State, 343 Ga. App. 19 ( 806 SE2d 1 ) (2017), quoting Burrell v. State, 301 Ga. 21, 24 (2) ( 799 SE2d 181 ) (2017). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). 4 See Diaz, 343 Ga. App. at 19 . 3 Having done so, the trial court adequately addr 2018Because there was evidence to support these findings, we must accept them, even if there is evidence to dispute them.4 In light of these findings, the trial court was authorized to conclude, as it did, that a motion to suppress Thompson’s statement would not have been successful. 2 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Diaz v. State, 343 Ga. App. 19 ( 806 SE2d 1 ) (2017), quoting Burrell v. State, 301 Ga. 21, 24 (2) ( 799 SE2d 181 ) (2017). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). 4 See Diaz, 343 Ga. App. at 19 . 3 Having done so, the trial court adequately addr | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Jupiter v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Tate v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Bobbitt v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three 2011Additionally, Thompson did not know of an address or city to which the two were traveling. 3 The officer testified that, in his experience, an air freshener is often used to mask the scent of narcotics. 4 At a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court held that this statement was admissible at trial. 5 See OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). 6 Jupiter v. State, 308 Ga. App. 386, 387 (1) ( 707 SE2d 592 ) (2011) (footnote and punctuation omitted). 7 Id. (footnote and punctuation omitted); see also Lowe v. State, 214 Ga. App. 92, 93 ( 446 SE2d 532 ) (1994) (noting that appellate review is guided by three | 1 | 1 |
Wanzer v. Stategreen2 sentences1975See Wanzer v. State, 232 Ga. 523, 529 ( 207 SE2d 466 ); Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 417 ( 216 SE2d 258 ). 1975See Wanzer v. State, 232 Ga. 523, 529 ( 207 SE2d 466 ); Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 417 ( 216 SE2d 258 ). | 1 | 1 |
Jarrell v. Stategreen2 sentences1975See Wanzer v. State, 232 Ga. 523, 529 ( 207 SE2d 466 ); Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 417 ( 216 SE2d 258 ). 1975See Wanzer v. State, 232 Ga. 523, 529 ( 207 SE2d 466 ); Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 417 ( 216 SE2d 258 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2018Because there was evidence to support these findings, we must accept them, even if there is evidence to dispute them.4 In light of these findings, the trial court was authorized to conclude, as it did, that a motion to suppress Thompson’s statement would not have been successful. 2 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Diaz v. State, 343 Ga. App. 19 ( 806 SE2d 1 ) (2017), quoting Burrell v. State, 301 Ga. 21, 24 (2) ( 799 SE2d 181 ) (2017). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). 4 See Diaz, 343 Ga. App. at 19 . 3 Having done so, the trial court adequately addr 1988The trial court conducted a pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing, and determined that the statements were voluntarily made, after the defendant had knowingly and intelligently waived his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). | 2 | 1988–2018 |
Davenport v. State
green
1 sentence2020He also argues that the trial court “failed to apply the proper procedural safeguards for juveniles” at the pre-trial Jackson-Denno hearing when determining that Lester’s statements were knowing and voluntary and thus admissible.7 Because Lester has failed to show that the trial court 385, 399 ( 846 SE2d 83 ) (2020). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
DIAZ v. the STATE.
green
2 sentences2018Because there was evidence to support these findings, we must accept them, even if there is evidence to dispute them.4 In light of these findings, the trial court was authorized to conclude, as it did, that a motion to suppress Thompson’s statement would not have been successful. 2 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Diaz v. State, 343 Ga. App. 19 ( 806 SE2d 1 ) (2017), quoting Burrell v. State, 301 Ga. 21, 24 (2) ( 799 SE2d 181 ) (2017). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). 4 See Diaz, 343 Ga. App. at 19 . 3 Having done so, the trial court adequately addr 2018Because there was evidence to support these findings, we must accept them, even if there is evidence to dispute them.4 In light of these findings, the trial court was authorized to conclude, as it did, that a motion to suppress Thompson’s statement would not have been successful. 2 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Diaz v. State, 343 Ga. App. 19 ( 806 SE2d 1 ) (2017), quoting Burrell v. State, 301 Ga. 21, 24 (2) ( 799 SE2d 181 ) (2017). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). 4 See Diaz, 343 Ga. App. at 19 . 3 Having done so, the trial court adequately addr | 1 | 2018–2018 |