Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hanapigreen2 sentences2012In the criminal context, one countervailing interest of particular importance, and explicitly stated in the constitutional provision, is “the right of the State to regulate such rights.” In the first ease examining the native Hawaiian privilege as a defense to a criminal conviction, State v. Hanapi, Alapai Hanapi was convicted of trespass after he entered his neighbor’s land to observe the restoration of the Kihaloko and Waihilahila fishponds. 89 Hawai'i 177, 178 , 970 P.2d 485, 486 (1998). 2012In the criminal context, one countervailing interest of particular importance, and explicitly stated in the constitutional provision, is "the right of the State to regulate such rights." In the first case examining the native Hawaiian privilege as a defense to a criminal conviction, State v. Hanapi , Alapai Hanapi was convicted of trespass after he entered his neighbor's land to observe the restoration of the Kihaloko and Waihilahila fishponds. 89 Hawai`i 177, 178, 970 P.2d 485, 486 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Prattgreen2 sentences2026App. Dec. 11, 2015) (mem. op.) (brackets omitted) (quoting State v. Pratt, 127 Hawaiʻi 206, 216, 277 P.3d 300, 310 (2012)). 2026App. Dec. 11, 2015) (mem. op.) (brackets omitted) (quoting State v. Pratt, 127 Hawaiʻi 206, 216, 277 P.3d 300, 310 (2012)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nesmith
green
1 sentence2014Pratt, 127 Hawai'i at 216 , 277 P.3d at 310. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaght
green
1 sentence1952(Northern Pacific Railway v. Slaght, 205 U. S. 122, 133 .) This type of case accounts for many of the decisions seemingly contrary to the federal and Hawaiian rule. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.