Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cabral v. McBryde Sugar Co., Ltd.green1 sentence1992App. 223, 226-27 , 647 P.2d 1232, 1234 (1982) (discretion exercised in addressing strict liability claim not raised below). 8 In Bidar , the plaintiff sustained injuries when, as a guest of a hotel, she grabbed a towel bar in her hotel room as support in rising from a toilet seat. 66 Haw. at 554, 669 P.2d at 160 . 9 The publ isher of the chart had taken the specifications prescribed by the FA A in tabular form and had portrayed the information on graphic approach charts. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bidar v. Amfac, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Thus, according to Bidar , “[wjhether it was foreseeable that a guest would grab a towel bar within easy reach for support in rising from a toilet seat is in our view a genuine issue of material fact that ought to be left for jury consideration.” Id. at 554 , 669 P.2d at 160 . 2011Thus, according to Bidar , "[w]hether it was foreseeable that a guest would grab a towel bar within easy reach for support in rising from a toilet seat is in our view a genuine issue of material fact that ought to be left for jury consideration." Id. at 554 , 669 P.2d at 160 . | 5 | 1987–2011 |
Pickard v. City and County of Honolulu
green
2 sentences2011Thus, according to Bidar , “[wjhether it was foreseeable that a guest would grab a towel bar within easy reach for support in rising from a toilet seat is in our view a genuine issue of material fact that ought to be left for jury consideration.” Id. at 554 , 669 P.2d at 160 . 2011Thus, according to Bidar , "[w]hether it was foreseeable that a guest would grab a towel bar within easy reach for support in rising from a toilet seat is in our view a genuine issue of material fact that ought to be left for jury consideration." Id. at 554 , 669 P.2d at 160 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Barbara A. Brocklesby v. United States of America, and Jeppesen and Company
green
1 sentence1992Brocklesby, 767 F.2d at 1292 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |