Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baker v. City of Ottumwagreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad 2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 2 |
Laufert v. Wegnergreen1 sentence2019See Laufert v. Wegner, 62 N.W.2d 758, 759 (Iowa 1954). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Mlakargreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 1 |
Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church of Crescogreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 1 |
Kulish v. Ellsworthgreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 1 |
Adams v. City of Des Moinesgreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 1 |
Hansen v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See, e.g., Adams v. City of Des Moines, 629 N.W.2d 367, 371 (Iowa 2001) (giving broad interpretation to section 670.4(11), relying on “this court’s application of a companion exception in Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578 (Iowa 1997),” where we held the language of that section “created a very broad classification of claims”); Kulish, 566 N.W.2d at 891 (characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”); Humphries v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church, 566 N.W.2d 869, 873 (Iowa 1997) (giving broad | 1 | 1 |
Stein v. Bowmangreen2 sentences2001See 1 Kenneth S. Broun et al., McCormick on Evidence § 78, at 292-94 (John William Strong ed., 4th ed. 1992); 7 Adams & Weeg, Iowa *31 Practice § 503.1, at 297. 1 Like its ancient counterpart, this privilege largely exists to promote marital harmony and stability. 2 See Stein v. Bowman, 13 Pet. 209 , 38 U.S. 209, 223 , 10 L.Ed. 129, 136 (1839); Sexton v. Sexton, 129 Iowa 487, 489 , 105 N.W. 2001See 1 Kenneth S. Broun et al., McCormick on Evidence § 78, at 292-94 (John William Strong ed., 4th ed. 1992); 7 Adams & Weeg, Iowa *31 Practice § 503.1, at 297. 1 Like its ancient counterpart, this privilege largely exists to promote marital harmony and stability. 2 See Stein v. Bowman, 13 Pet. 209 , 38 U.S. 209, 223 , 10 L.Ed. 129, 136 (1839); Sexton v. Sexton, 129 Iowa 487, 489 , 105 N.W. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
green
2 sentences2002Broadrick, 413 U.S. at 610 , 93 S.Ct. at 2915 , 37 L.Ed.2d at 839 . 2002Broadrick, 413 U.S. at 610 , 93 S.Ct. at 2915 , 37 L.Ed.2d at 839 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Sexton v. Sexton
green
1 sentence2001See 1 Kenneth S. Broun et al., McCormick on Evidence § 78, at 292-94 (John William Strong ed., 4th ed. 1992); 7 Adams & Weeg, Iowa *31 Practice § 503.1, at 297. 1 Like its ancient counterpart, this privilege largely exists to promote marital harmony and stability. 2 See Stein v. Bowman, 13 Pet. 209 , 38 U.S. 209, 223 , 10 L.Ed. 129, 136 (1839); Sexton v. Sexton, 129 Iowa 487, 489 , 105 N.W. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.