Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dale Boelman and Nancy Boelman v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Companygreen1 sentence2025Reins., 826 N.W.2d 494, 500 (Iowa 2013). | 1 | 1 |
Teresa L. Sladek v. Employment Appeal Board and Kelly Services USA LLCgreen1 sentence2023Sladek, 939 N.W.2d at 637. | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Marc A. Hagengreen1 sentence2015“Questions of statuto *4 ry interpretation ... are reviewed for correction of errors at law.” State v. Hagen, 840 N.W.2d 140, 144 (Iowa 2013); accord State v. Snyder, 634 N.W.2d 613, 614-15 (Iowa 2001) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a snowmobile is a motor vehicle); State v. McCoy, 618 N.W.2d 324, 325 (Iowa 2000) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a sword cane is a closed and fastened container). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Snydergreen1 sentence2015“Questions of statuto *4 ry interpretation ... are reviewed for correction of errors at law.” State v. Hagen, 840 N.W.2d 140, 144 (Iowa 2013); accord State v. Snyder, 634 N.W.2d 613, 614-15 (Iowa 2001) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a snowmobile is a motor vehicle); State v. McCoy, 618 N.W.2d 324, 325 (Iowa 2000) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a sword cane is a closed and fastened container). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCoygreen1 sentence2015“Questions of statuto *4 ry interpretation ... are reviewed for correction of errors at law.” State v. Hagen, 840 N.W.2d 140, 144 (Iowa 2013); accord State v. Snyder, 634 N.W.2d 613, 614-15 (Iowa 2001) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a snowmobile is a motor vehicle); State v. McCoy, 618 N.W.2d 324, 325 (Iowa 2000) (applying the errors-at-law standard to the question whether a sword cane is a closed and fastened container). | 1 | 1 |
Vachon v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Vachon v. State, 514 N.W.2d 442, 443 (Iowa 1994) (applying the errors-at-law standard in determining whether the district court correctly applied the discovery rule in a tort action). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jason Bluml v. Dee Jay's Inc. d/b/a Long John Silvers and Commerce & Industry Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences2020Ochoa, 888 N.W.2d at 892– 93, 896-97. “[W]e accept the commissioner’s factual findings when supported by substantial evidence.” Bluml, 920 N.W.2d at 84 . 2020Ochoa, 888 N.W.2d at 892– 93, 896-97. “[W]e accept the commissioner’s factual findings when supported by substantial evidence.” Bluml, 920 N.W.2d at 84 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Jbs Swift & Company and American Zurich Insurance Company v. Rosalva Ochoa
green
2 sentences2020Ochoa, 888 N.W.2d at 892– 93, 896-97. “[W]e accept the commissioner’s factual findings when supported by substantial evidence.” Bluml, 920 N.W.2d at 84 . 2020Ochoa, 888 N.W.2d at 892– 93, 896-97. “[W]e accept the commissioner’s factual findings when supported by substantial evidence.” Bluml, 920 N.W.2d at 84 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.