Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lanegreen2 sentences2020Thus, the doctrine operates as an extension of the exclusionary rule.” State v. Lane, 726 N.W.2d 371, 380 (Iowa 2007). 2014“Thus, the doctrine operates as an extension of the exclusionary rule.” Lane, 726 N.W.2d at 380 . | 2 | 3 |
State v. Hamiltongreen2 sentences2007See State v. Hamilton, 335 N.W.2d 154, 158 (Iowa 1983) (writing that originally the exclusionary rule suppressed evidence "discovered as a result of illegal government activity," and that later "the concept was expanded to include other, indirect, evidence `tainted' by the original illegality" known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree" (citations omitted)). 2007See State v. Hamilton, 335 N.W.2d 154, 158 (Iowa 1983) (writing that originally the exclusionary rule suppressed evidence “discovered as a result of illegal government activity,” and that later “the concept was expanded to. include other, indirect, evidence ‘tainted’ by the original illegality” known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree” (citations omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Draytongreen1 sentence2020“Law enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable seizures merely by approaching individuals on the street or in other public places and putting questions to them if they are willing to 9 listen.” United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 200 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Salvuccigreen1 sentence2014See United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 85 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.