Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Orison F. McDonald II and Herbert Darrell Bomar v. Bill Burrows, Sheriff of Wichita County, Texas, the State of Texas, and the State of Minnesotagreen2 sentences2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (lst Cir. 1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir. 1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2nd Cir. 1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Sabatier v. Dabrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (lst Cir. 1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F. Supp. 184, 187 ( 2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (1st Cir.1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n. 19 (2nd Cir.1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Saba-tier v. Dahrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (1st Cir.1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F.Supp. 184, 187 (D.N | 3 | 3 |
Timothy J. Judd v. George A. Vose, Jr.green2 sentences2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (lst Cir. 1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir. 1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2nd Cir. 1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Sabatier v. Dabrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (lst Cir. 1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F. Supp. 184, 187 ( 2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (1st Cir.1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n. 19 (2nd Cir.1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Saba-tier v. Dahrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (1st Cir.1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F.Supp. 184, 187 (D.N | 3 | 3 |
Dunkin v. Lambgreen2 sentences2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (lst Cir. 1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir. 1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2nd Cir. 1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Sabatier v. Dabrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (lst Cir. 1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F. Supp. 184, 187 ( 2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (1st Cir.1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n. 19 (2nd Cir.1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Saba-tier v. Dahrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (1st Cir.1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F.Supp. 184, 187 (D.N | 3 | 3 |
Guy Sabatier v. Sheriff Edward K. Dabrowski, Etc.green2 sentences2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (lst Cir. 1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir. 1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2nd Cir. 1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Sabatier v. Dabrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (lst Cir. 1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F. Supp. 184, 187 ( 2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (1st Cir.1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n. 19 (2nd Cir.1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Saba-tier v. Dahrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (1st Cir.1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F.Supp. 184, 187 (D.N | 3 | 3 |
State v. Gaygreen2 sentences1999See State v. Gay, 526 N.W.2d 294, 297 (Iowa 1995) (defendant incarcerated in Illinois was not denied due process where he was forced to either waive his constitutional right to an extradition hearing or be convicted for failing to appear in an Iowa criminal proceeding). 1996Gay, 526 N.W.2d at 297 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Francesco Caltagirone v. George v. Grant, United States Marshal
green
2 sentences2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (lst Cir. 1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir. 1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n.19 (2nd Cir. 1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Sabatier v. Dabrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (lst Cir. 1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F. Supp. 184, 187 ( 2016Judd v. Vose, 813 F.2d 494, 497 (1st Cir.1987) (holding no right to a counsel attaches at an extradition hearing); McDonald v. Burrows, 731 F.2d 294, 297 (5th Cir.1984) (noting extradition is not a criminal proceeding, and so Sixth Amendment rights not implicated); Caltagirone v. Grant, 629 F.2d 739 , 748 n. 19 (2nd Cir.1980) (noting that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions and therefore not to an extradition); Saba-tier v. Dahrowski, 586 F.2d 866, 869 (1st Cir.1978) (holding no right to a speedy trial at extradition proceedings); Dunkin v. Lamb, 500 F.Supp. 184, 187 (D.N | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.