force rule (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

force rule in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1917–1988 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Olsengreen
iowa · 1980 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
1 sentence

1980See State v. Olsen, 293 N.W.2d 216, 220-21 (Iowa 1980).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Barrett green
iowa · 1987
2 sentences

1988Under our rule in Barrett , the prosecution may not avoid the force of the rule excluding such evidence by seeking to bring it in under some exception to the rule. 401 N.W.2d at 187 .

1988Under our rule in Barrett , the prosecution may not avoid the force of the rule excluding such evidence by seeking to bring it in under some exception to the rule. 401 N.W.2d at 187 .

11988–1988
Shenkle v. Mains green
iowa · 1933
2 sentences

1935In coming to our conclusion, we cannot avoid recognizing the force of the analysis of the “guest” statute under which plaintiff seeks to recover as set out in Shenkle v. Mains, 216 Iowa 1324, 1328 , 247 N. W. 635, 637 , where it is said: “The two grounds upon which recovery may be predicated under section 5026-bl are exceptional and not general.

1935In coming to our conclusion, we cannot avoid recognizing the force of the analysis of the “guest” statute under which plaintiff seeks to recover as set out in Shenkle v. Mains, 216 Iowa 1324, 1328 , 247 N. W. 635, 637 , where it is said: “The two grounds upon which recovery may be predicated under section 5026-bl are exceptional and not general.

11935–1935
Dickinson v. Eichorn neutral
iowa · 1889
1 sentence

1926Counsel for appellee would avoid the force of the doctrine of Dickinson v. Eichorn, supra, by the contention that, since the enactment of.

11926–1926
Mitchell v. Phillips Mining Co. green
iowa · 1917
1 sentence

1917We have decided this point in Mitchell v. Phillips Mining Co., 181 Iowa 600 , and adversely to appellee’s claim.

11917–1917

Where else courts name it

TX 82 (1883–2025) CA 82 (1859–2026) NY 36 (1875–2024) PA 20 (1857–2023) MA 19 (1905–2026) IL 15 (1874–2014) OH 13 (1924–2026) FL 13 (1975–2012) WA 13 (1911–2021) KS 13 (1892–2023) AL 8 (1909–2010) WI 8 (1876–2025) IN 8 (1891–2020) OK 8 (1913–2023) MO 7 (1902–2012) GA 6 (1927–1972) MI 6 (1925–2016) CT 5 (1907–2017) AR 5 (1912–1948) NC 5 (1910–1976) IA 5 (1917–1988) NJ 5 (1891–2018) ME 5 (1935–1981) MD 5 (1964–2022) LA 5 (1967–2024) NE 5 (1904–2003) DC 4 (1987–2021) MT 4 (1928–2025) MN 4 (1905–1985) SC 4 (1880–1934) OR 4 (1913–2024) KY 4 (1923–1987) NV 4 (1867–2011) UT 3 (1947–2017) AZ 3 (1928–1983) TN 3 (1928–1971) VA 3 (1941–2025) CO 3 (1894–1962) VT 3 (1887–1933) NM 2 (1933–1957) WV 2 (1888–1903) ID 2 (1937–2021) SD 2 (1988–2006) MS 2 (1874–2021) ND 2 (1900–1970) WY 2 (1937–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check