Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sloviaczek v. Estate of Puckettgreen2 sentences2016In Sloviaczek , this Court adopted the Lamb-Weston doctrine, established by the Oregon Supreme Court. 98 Idaho at 374 , 565 P.2d at 567 (adopting the doctrine established in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co., 219 Or. 110 , 341 P.2d 110 (1959)). 2016In Sloviaczek , this Court adopted the Lamb-Weston doctrine, established by the Oregon Supreme Court. 98 Idaho at 374 , 565 P.2d at 567 (adopting the doctrine established in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co., 219 Or. 110 , 341 P.2d 110 (1959)). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Continental Casualty Co.green2 sentences1995See also State v. Continental Casualty Co., 126 Idaho 178, 185 , 879 P.2d 1111, 1118 (1994) (applying Lamb-Weston rule). 1995See also State v. Continental Casualty Co., 126 Idaho 178, 185 , 879 P.2d 1111, 1118 (1994) (applying Lamb-Weston rule). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2016In Sloviaczek , this Court adopted the Lamb-Weston doctrine, established by the Oregon Supreme Court. 98 Idaho at 374 , 565 P.2d at 567 (adopting the doctrine established in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co., 219 Or. 110 , 341 P.2d 110 (1959)). 2016In Sloviaczek , this Court adopted the Lamb-Weston doctrine, established by the Oregon Supreme Court. 98 Idaho at 374 , 565 P.2d at 567 (adopting the doctrine established in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co., 219 Or. 110 , 341 P.2d 110 (1959)). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Viani v. Aetna Insurance Company
yellow
2 sentences1977Co., 95 Idaho 22 , 501 P.2d 706 (1972). 1977Co., 95 Idaho 22 , 501 P.2d 706 (1972). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.