5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.green2 sentences2020Cf. Boel, 137 Idaho at 16 , 43 P.3d at 775 (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered nine of the enumerated factors and indicated it had considered the other three but found their impact to be negligible.). 2020Cf. Boel, 137 Idaho at 16 , 43 P.3d at 775 (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered nine of the enumerated factors and indicated it had considered the other three but found their impact to be negligible.). | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1997See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 668, 104 S.Ct. at 2052; Aragon, 114 Idaho at 758 , 760 P.2d at 1174 . 1997See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 668, 104 S.Ct. at 2052; Aragon, 114 Idaho at 758 , 760 P.2d at 1174 . | 1 | 1 |
Butz v. Economougreen1 sentence1996See Id. at 498-504, 98 S.Ct. at 2906-09 ; 13B Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3573.3 (2d ed.1984). | 1 | 1 |
Schweiker v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1990See also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 , 101 S.Ct. 1074 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981); Idaho Dep't of Employment v. Smith, 434 U.S. 100 , 98 S.Ct. 327 , 54 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977). [5] One commentator on the subject identified the practical problems inherent in defending a product liability claim after the passage of a significant period of time. 1990See also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 , 101 S.Ct. 1074 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981); Idaho Dep't of Employment v. Smith, 434 U.S. 100 , 98 S.Ct. 327 , 54 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977). [5] One commentator on the subject identified the practical problems inherent in defending a product liability claim after the passage of a significant period of time. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aragon v. State
green
2 sentences1997See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 668, 104 S.Ct. at 2052; Aragon, 114 Idaho at 758 , 760 P.2d at 1174 . 1997See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 668, 104 S.Ct. at 2052; Aragon, 114 Idaho at 758 , 760 P.2d at 1174 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Idaho Department of Employment v. Smith
green
2 sentences1990See also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 , 101 S.Ct. 1074 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981); Idaho Dep't of Employment v. Smith, 434 U.S. 100 , 98 S.Ct. 327 , 54 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977). [5] One commentator on the subject identified the practical problems inherent in defending a product liability claim after the passage of a significant period of time. 1990See also Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 , 101 S.Ct. 1074 , 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981); Idaho Dep't of Employment v. Smith, 434 U.S. 100 , 98 S.Ct. 327 , 54 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977). [5] One commentator on the subject identified the practical problems inherent in defending a product liability claim after the passage of a significant period of time. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ladd v. Coats
green
2 sentences1985Therefore, the court could have applied the standards of rule 54(e) in its discretion, Ladd v. Coats, 105 Idaho 250 , 668 P.2d 126 (1983), but it was not required to. 1985Therefore, the court could have applied the standards of rule 54(e) in its discretion, Ladd v. Coats, 105 Idaho 250 , 668 P.2d 126 (1983), but it was not required to. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.