Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Heflin v. Koszelagreen2 sentences2004Heflin v. Koszela, 774 A.2d 25, 29 (R.I.2001). 2003See Heflin v. Koszela, 774 A.2d 25, 29 (R.I.2001). | 2 | 2 |
Lacey v. Reitsmagreen2 sentences2008Lacey, 899 A.2d at 457 . 2008Lacey v. Reitsma, 899 A.2d 455, 457 (R.I.2006); see also Ruggiero v. City of Providence, 893 A.2d 235, 237 (R.I.2006). | 1 | 2 |
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Arbella Protection Insurancegreen2 sentences2016“It is a fundamental principle that [sjummary judgment is a drastic remedy, and a motion for summary judgment should be dealt with cautiously.” Id. (quoting Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Arbella Protection Insurance Co., 24 A.3d 544, 553 (R.I.2011)), “We will affirm a lower court's decision only if, after reviewing the admissible evidence in the light most favorable' to the nonmoving party, we conclude that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. (quoting Great American E & S Insurance Co., 45 A.3d at 574 ). “[T]he 2016“It is a fundamental principle that [sjummary judgment is a drastic remedy, and a motion for summary judgment should be dealt with cautiously.” Id. (quoting Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Arbella Protection Insurance Co., 24 A.3d 544, 553 (R.I.2011)), “We will affirm a lower court's decision only if, after reviewing the admissible evidence in the light most favorable' to the nonmoving party, we conclude that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. (quoting Great American E & S Insurance Co., 45 A.3d at 574 ). “[T]he | 1 | 1 |
The Law Firm of Thomas A. Tarro, III v. Maria Checrallahgreen1 sentence2016II Standard of Review “The grant of a motion for summary judgment is reviewed by this Court de novo, employing the same standards and rule s used by the hearing justice.” The Law Firm of Thomas A. Tarro, III v. Checrallah, 60 A.3d 598, 601 (R.1.2013) (quoting Great American E & S Insurance Co. v. End Zone Pub & Grill of Narragansett, Inc., 45 A.3d 571, 574 (R.I.2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Great American E & S Insurance v. End Zone Pub & Grill of Narragansett, Inc.green2 sentences2016II Standard of Review “The grant of a motion for summary judgment is reviewed by this Court de novo, employing the same standards and rule s used by the hearing justice.” The Law Firm of Thomas A. Tarro, III v. Checrallah, 60 A.3d 598, 601 (R.1.2013) (quoting Great American E & S Insurance Co. v. End Zone Pub & Grill of Narragansett, Inc., 45 A.3d 571, 574 (R.I.2012)). 2016“It is a fundamental principle that [sjummary judgment is a drastic remedy, and a motion for summary judgment should be dealt with cautiously.” Id. (quoting Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Arbella Protection Insurance Co., 24 A.3d 544, 553 (R.I.2011)), “We will affirm a lower court's decision only if, after reviewing the admissible evidence in the light most favorable' to the nonmoving party, we conclude that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. (quoting Great American E & S Insurance Co., 45 A.3d at 574 ). “[T]he | 1 | 1 |
Ruggiero v. City of Providencegreen1 sentence2008Lacey v. Reitsma, 899 A.2d 455, 457 (R.I.2006); see also Ruggiero v. City of Providence, 893 A.2d 235, 237 (R.I.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Ritter v. Mantissa Investment Corp.green1 sentence2007Ritter v. Mantissa Investment Corp., 864 A.2d 601, 604 (R.I.2005). | 1 | 1 |
Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.green1 sentence1998Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc., 674 A.2d 1223, 1225 (R.I.1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.
green
2 sentences1976In his representation of the defendant, Mr. Malinou should be guided by the standards for defense counsel set forth in United States v. De Coster, 487 F.2d 1197 (D.C. 1976In his representation of the defendant, Mr. Malinou should be guided by the standards for defense counsel set forth in United States v. De Coster, 487 F.2d 1197 (D.C. | 2 | 1976–1976 |
DelSanto v. Hyundai Motor Finance Co.
green
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.