Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cravengreen2 sentences2008In the present case, the trial court cited People v. Craven, 54 Ill. 2d 419, 429 , 299 N.E.2d 1, 6 (1973), for the proposition that “the presence of these objective indicia of trustworthiness [is] necessary for admissibility under the admission against penal interest exception,” concluding that none of the required indicia were shown in this case. 2008In the present case, the trial court cited People v. Craven, 54 Ill. 2d 419, 429 , 299 N.E.2d 1, 6 (1973), for the proposition that “the presence of these objective indicia of trustworthiness [is] necessary for admissibility under the admission against penal interest exception,” concluding that none of the required indicia were shown in this case. | 2 | 4 |
People v. Tategreen2 sentences1985(People v. Tate (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 134, 143, 145 , 429 N.E.2d 470 ; People v. Lettrich (1952), 413 Ill. 172, 178 , 108 N.E.2d 488 .) For such evidence to be admissible four indicia of reliability must be satisfied: (1) the hearsay statement was made spontaneously shortly after the crime to a close acquaintance; (2) the statement was corroborated by other evidence; (3) the statement was self-incriminating and a declaration against interest; and (4) there was an adequate opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant. 1985(People v. Tate (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 134, 143, 145 , 429 N.E.2d 470 ; People v. Lettrich (1952), 413 Ill. 172, 178 , 108 N.E.2d 488 .) For such evidence to be admissible four indicia of reliability must be satisfied: (1) the hearsay statement was made spontaneously shortly after the crime to a close acquaintance; (2) the statement was corroborated by other evidence; (3) the statement was self-incriminating and a declaration against interest; and (4) there was an adequate opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chambers v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences1987Ed. 2d 297, 311-12 , 93 S. Ct. 1038, 1048-49 .) This court has adopted the language of Chambers and held that the presence of objective indicia of trustworthiness is necessary for admissibility under the admission-against-penal-interest exception. 1981Ed. 2d 297, 311-12 , 93 S. Ct. 1038, 1048-49 .) This court has adopted the language of Chambers and held that the presence of objective indicia of trustworthiness is necessary for admissibility under the admission-against-penal-interest exception. | 2 | 1981–1987 |
People v. Lettrich
green
2 sentences1985(People v. Tate (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 134, 143, 145 , 429 N.E.2d 470 ; People v. Lettrich (1952), 413 Ill. 172, 178 , 108 N.E.2d 488 .) For such evidence to be admissible four indicia of reliability must be satisfied: (1) the hearsay statement was made spontaneously shortly after the crime to a close acquaintance; (2) the statement was corroborated by other evidence; (3) the statement was self-incriminating and a declaration against interest; and (4) there was an adequate opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant. 1985(People v. Tate (1981), 87 Ill. 2d 134, 143, 145 , 429 N.E.2d 470 ; People v. Lettrich (1952), 413 Ill. 172, 178 , 108 N.E.2d 488 .) For such evidence to be admissible four indicia of reliability must be satisfied: (1) the hearsay statement was made spontaneously shortly after the crime to a close acquaintance; (2) the statement was corroborated by other evidence; (3) the statement was self-incriminating and a declaration against interest; and (4) there was an adequate opportunity for cross-examination of the declarant. | 1 | 1985–1985 |