Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cruzgreen2 sentences2012Our supreme court has directed just the opposite course, calling for “rigorous enforcement” of the affirmative damage requirement in order to foreclose the “introduction of oral inconsistent statements under the guise of impeachment.” Cruz, 162 Ill. 2d at 362 . 2012Our supreme court has directed just the opposite course, calling for "rigorous enforcement" of the affirmative damage requirement in order to foreclose the "introduction of oral inconsistent statements under the guise of impeachment." Cruz, 162 Ill.2d at 362 , 205 Ill.Dec. 345 , 643 N.E.2d 636 . | 2 | 4 |
People v. Speedgreen2 sentences2012See Speed, 315 Ill. 2012See Speed, 315 Ill.App.3d at 517 , 247 Ill.Dec. 268 , 731 N.E.2d 1276 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Bradfordgreen2 sentences1994See Bradford, 106 Ill.2d at 500 , 88 Ill.Dec. 615 , 478 N.E.2d 1341 ("[a] court's witness may be impeached by a prior inconsistent statement when the witness' testimony damages the position of the impeaching party"); M. 1994See Bradford, 106 Ill.2d at 500 , 88 Ill.Dec. 615 , 478 N.E.2d 1341 ("[a] court's witness may be impeached by a prior inconsistent statement when the witness' testimony damages the position of the impeaching party"); M. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.