Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jsa v. Mhgreen1 sentence2020We disagree. ¶ 25 As noted, we must read relevant provisions of a statute as a whole (J.S.A., 224 Ill. 2d at 197) and in light of the consequences that may arise in interpreting a statute one way or another (Sperl, 2018 IL 123132, ¶ 23 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Bermudez
green
2 sentences2023CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Bermudez, 2014 IL App (1st) 122824, ¶ 57 . ¶ 12 Here, the Burnetts failed to supply a report of proceedings from the confirmation hearing. 2023CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Bermudez, 2014 IL App (1st) 122824, ¶ 57 . ¶ 12 Here, the Burnetts failed to supply a report of proceedings from the confirmation hearing. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Corral v. Mervis Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024“Without an adequate record preserving the claimed error, the reviewing court must presume the circuit court had a sufficient factual basis for its holding and that its order conforms with the law.” Id. at 157 . - 11 - No. 1-23-1994 ¶ 28 Absent a report of proceedings from the confirmation hearing, we cannot determine how the circuit court considered Martha’s objection to the sale, specifically as it related to her exhibits and Regulation X, and ultimately, we cannot determine why the court confirmed the sale. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sperl v. Henry
green
1 sentence2020We disagree. ¶ 25 As noted, we must read relevant provisions of a statute as a whole (J.S.A., 224 Ill. 2d at 197) and in light of the consequences that may arise in interpreting a statute one way or another (Sperl, 2018 IL 123132, ¶ 23 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bank of America, N.A. v. Higgin
neutral
1 sentence2014That section states: “The confirmation order may also: -8- 2014 IL App (2d) 131302 (1) approve the mortgagee’s fees and costs arising between the entry of the judgment of foreclosure and the confirmation hearing, those costs and fees to be allowable to the same extent as provided in the note and mortgage and in Section 15-1504[.]” (Emphasis added.) 735 ILCS 5/15-1508(b)(1) (West 2012). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.