evidence elicited defense (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

evidence elicited defense in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Jackson green
illappct · 2000
2 sentences

2005Prejudice is established because, without the evidence elicited by defense counsel, the court could not have found defendant guilty.” Jackson, 318 Ill.

2005Prejudice is established because without the evidence elicited by defense counsel, the court could not have found defendant guilty." Jackson , 318 Ill.

42005–2005
People v. Rednour green
illappct · 1974
1 sentence

1975A reviewing court should reduce a term of imprisonment to a term of probation only where, “* * * after close examination and scrutiny, it is apparent that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for probation.” (People v. Rednour, 24 Ill.App.3d 1072, 1077 .) On the evidence elicited at the hearing, we cannot find an abuse of discretion.

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

NY 16 (1972–2026) IL 5 (1975–2005) MA 4 (1973–2015) UT 3 (1980–2023) CA 3 (1975–2024) TX 2 (1996–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check