Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thornburg v. Crystal Lake Park Districtgreen2 sentences2005See Thornburg v. Crystal Lake Park District, 171 Ill. 2005See Thornburg v. Crystal Lake Park District , 171 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
red
2 sentences1975Furthermore, in the case of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (1975), 421 U.S. 240, 247 , 44 L.Ed.2d 141, 147 , 95 S.Ct. 1612, 1616 , the Supreme Court cited Hall v. Cole for the general rule that a litigant must pay his own attorneys fees and stated: “We are asked to fashion a far-reaching exception to this ‘American rule’; but having considered its origin and development, we are convinced that it would be inappropriate for the Judiciary, without legislative guidance, to reallocate the burdens of litigation * * V In view of this specific language affirming the traditional “Am 1975Furthermore, in the case of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (1975), 421 U.S. 240, 247 , 44 L.Ed.2d 141, 147 , 95 S.Ct. 1612, 1616 , the Supreme Court cited Hall v. Cole for the general rule that a litigant must pay his own attorneys fees and stated: “We are asked to fashion a far-reaching exception to this ‘American rule’; but having considered its origin and development, we are convinced that it would be inappropriate for the Judiciary, without legislative guidance, to reallocate the burdens of litigation * * V In view of this specific language affirming the traditional “Am | 3 | 1975–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.