federal commerce clause (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

federal commerce clause in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Illinois Commerce Commissiongreen
ill · 2008 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Madigan v. Illinois Commerce Comm’n, 231 Ill. 2d 370, 377 (2008). ¶ 15 ANALYSIS ¶ 16 On appeal, Shared Imaging argues that (1) Units 229, 231, and 588 were not subject to the use tax, because they were subject to the temporary storage exemption under the Act (35 ILCS 105/3-55(e) (West 2008)); (2) Units 52, 55, 553, 579, 582, 585, and 591 were not subject to the use tax, because they were subject to the expanded temporary storage exemption under the Act (35 ILCS 105/3-55(j) (West 2008)); (3) the Department’s assessment of taxes was unconstitutional because it was not fairly apportioned under th

11
General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review Boardgreen
ill · 2007 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014General Motors, 224 Ill. 2d at 28-30 (finding that the Act does not violate the federal commerce clause).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. City of Chicago green
illappct · 1997
2 sentences

2023Specifically, Archer Daniels Midland Co. concerned whether the federal commerce clause and Illinois’s uniformity clause barred Illinois’s attempt to impose a natural gas use tax on out-of-state sellers. 294 Ill.

2023Specifically, Archer Daniels Midland Co. concerned whether the federal commerce clause and Illinois’s uniformity clause barred Illinois’s attempt to impose a natural gas use tax on out-of-state sellers. 294 Ill.

22023–2023
City of Chicago v. the Willett Co. green
ill · 1950
1 sentence

1953On a direct appeal that followed, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court and stated that while the ordinance was valid and the company’s local business included within its scope, the evidence, which showed that Willett Company’s trucks carried commingled cargoes to local and interstate destinations, disclosed that the ordinance ran afoul of the Federal commerce clause in this case for the reason that the company’s local and interstate activities were inseparable and that the company could not withdraw from one type of service without withdrawing from the other. ( 406 Ill. 286 .) In a clar

11953–1953
City of Chicago v. Willett Co. green
scotus · 1953
1 sentence

1953By a subsequent opinion, the high bench reversed our judgment holding that under the circumstances of the parties “* * * a tax of reasonable proportions such as the one in question not shown in fact to be a burden on interstate commerce, is not inconsistent with the Commerce Clause.” (City of Chicago v. Willett Co. 344 U.S. 574 , 97 L. ed. 333.) The same opinion remanded the cause to this court for proceedings not inconsistent with the views therein expressed and, inasmuch as the first opinion of this court did not consider all of the contentions relating to the validity of the ordinance under

11953–1953

Where else courts name it

CA 9 (1950–2024) IL 5 (1953–2023) WA 4 (2009–2009) NJ 2 (1981–1987) LA 2 (1981–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check