Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harton v. City of Chicago Department of Public Worksgreen1 sentence2021“Consequently, [an individual] who cannot, by reason of a physical condition, perform the duties of the job in question even with accommodation is not [disabled] within the meaning of the Act.” Harton v. City of Chicago Department of Public Works, 301 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Lewis
green
2 sentences1991App.3d 816, 821 , 139 Ill.Dec. 525, 528 , 548 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 .) This is an exception to the hearsay rule, and it does not require that the admission be made against the interest of the party. ( In re Estate of Lewis (1990), 193 Ill.App.3d 316, 323 , 140 Ill.Dec. 309, 313 , 549 N.E.2d 960, 964 .) As we have indicated, however, the statements contained in the letters were inconsistent with Fox's defense at trial. 1991App. 3d 316, 323 , 549 N.E.2d 960, 964 .) As we have indicated, however, the statements contained in the letters were inconsistent with Fox’s defense at trial. | 2 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Gliniewicz
green
1 sentence2020In People v. Gliniewicz, 2018 IL App (2d) 170490 (Gliniewicz I) 1, the State appealed the trial court’s order granting defendant’s original 1 In People v. Gliniewicz, 2019 IL App (2d) 190401-U (Gliniewicz II), the Village of Fox motion in limine to bar evidence of electronic communications between her and Joe, specifically those that were recovered from his cell phone and were related to their alleged criminal conduct. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Oakleaf v. Oakleaf & Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences1991The letters are therefore also admissible in accordance with the general rule that any statement made by a party or on his behalf which is inconsistent with his position in the litigation may be introduced into evidence against him. ( Oakleaf of Illinois v. Oakleaf & Associates (1988), 173 Ill.App.3d 637, 651 , 123 Ill.Dec. 288, 297 , 527 N.E.2d 926, 935 .) Plaintiff's exhibits 33 and 34 should therefore not be excluded from evidence as they were during the first trial. 1991The letters are therefore also admissible in accordance with the general rule that any statement made by a party or on his behalf which is inconsistent with his position in the litigation may be introduced into evidence against him. ( Oakleaf of Illinois v. Oakleaf & Associates (1988), 173 Ill.App.3d 637, 651 , 123 Ill.Dec. 288, 297 , 527 N.E.2d 926, 935 .) Plaintiff's exhibits 33 and 34 should therefore not be excluded from evidence as they were during the first trial. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Cardiel v. Warren
green
1 sentence1991App.3d 816, 821 , 139 Ill.Dec. 525, 528 , 548 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 .) This is an exception to the hearsay rule, and it does not require that the admission be made against the interest of the party. ( In re Estate of Lewis (1990), 193 Ill.App.3d 316, 323 , 140 Ill.Dec. 309, 313 , 549 N.E.2d 960, 964 .) As we have indicated, however, the statements contained in the letters were inconsistent with Fox's defense at trial. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Webb v. Reeser
green
1 sentence1991App.3d 816, 821 , 139 Ill.Dec. 525, 528 , 548 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 .) This is an exception to the hearsay rule, and it does not require that the admission be made against the interest of the party. ( In re Estate of Lewis (1990), 193 Ill.App.3d 316, 323 , 140 Ill.Dec. 309, 313 , 549 N.E.2d 960, 964 .) As we have indicated, however, the statements contained in the letters were inconsistent with Fox's defense at trial. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Reynolds
green
2 sentences1990(People v. Reynolds (1983), 94 Ill. 2d 160, 165 , 445 N.E.2d 766, 769 .) Under the facts of this case, the trial court was not manifestly erroneous in sustaining Mr. Fox’s motion to suppress. 1990(People v. Reynolds (1983), 94 Ill. 2d 160, 165 , 445 N.E.2d 766, 769 .) Under the facts of this case, the trial court was not manifestly erroneous in sustaining Mr. Fox’s motion to suppress. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Lange
green
2 sentences1985We observe that pursuant to the opinion in People v. Lange (1984), 102 Ill. 2d 225 , 464 N.E.2d 1071 , when, as here, an accused has posted more than one bond deposit, the clerk is empowered to retain an amount for bail bond costs from the “amount deposited at the time the case was concluded.” Thus, here, it would appear that under any circumstances, Fox is entitled to a return of the full amount he posted for pretrial bond; any bond costs retained by the court clerk must be solely based on the second (appeal) bond posted by Fox. 1985We observe that pursuant to the opinion in People v. Lange (1984), 102 Ill. 2d 225 , 464 N.E.2d 1071 , when, as here, an accused has posted more than one bond deposit, the clerk is empowered to retain an amount for bail bond costs from the “amount deposited at the time the case was concluded.” Thus, here, it would appear that under any circumstances, Fox is entitled to a return of the full amount he posted for pretrial bond; any bond costs retained by the court clerk must be solely based on the second (appeal) bond posted by Fox. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.