Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of Laboryellow2 sentences2026App. 3d 994, 1022 (1989) (“A reviewing court is not in a position to reweigh the evidence, but can merely determine if the decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”) (citing Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of Labor, 105 Ill. 2d 501, 506 (1985)); In re Custody of H.J., 2021 IL App (4th) 200401, ¶¶ 23-24 (stating, in a case with evidence pointing in both directions, the appellate court would affirm because of the highly deferential manifest weight standard of review). ¶ 44 Finally, respondent argues the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof when it remar 2026App. 3d 994, 1022 (1989) (“A reviewing court is not in a position to reweigh the evidence, but can merely determine if the decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”) (citing Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of Labor, 105 Ill. 2d 501, 506 (1985)). | 3 | 3 |
In re Custody of H.J.green2 sentences2026App. 3d 994, 1022 (1989) (“A reviewing court is not in a position to reweigh the evidence, but can merely determine if the decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence.”) (citing Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of Labor, 105 Ill. 2d 501, 506 (1985)); In re Custody of H.J., 2021 IL App (4th) 200401, ¶¶ 23-24 (stating, in a case with evidence pointing in both directions, the appellate court would affirm because of the highly deferential manifest weight standard of review). ¶ 44 Finally, respondent argues the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof when it remar 2026See In re Custody of H.J., 2021 IL App (4th) 200401, ¶¶ 23-24 (stating, in a case with evidence pointing in both directions, the appellate court would affirm because of the highly deferential manifest weight standard of review); Tate v. Illinois Pollution Control Board, 188 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
Tate v. Pollution Control Boardgreen2 sentences2026See In re Custody of H.J., 2021 IL -8- App (4th) 200401, ¶¶ 23-24 (stating, in a case with evidence pointing in both directions, the appellate court would affirm because of the highly deferential manifest weight standard of review); Tate v. Illinois Pollution Control Board, 188 Ill. 2026See In re Custody of H.J., 2021 IL App (4th) 200401, ¶¶ 23-24 (stating, in a case with evidence pointing in both directions, the appellate court would affirm because of the highly deferential manifest weight standard of review); Tate v. Illinois Pollution Control Board, 188 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Kelly v. Orricogreen1 sentence2021See Kelly v. Orrico, 2014 IL App (2d) 130002, ¶ 27 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re DT
green
1 sentence2026Respondent is correct that “following a finding of unfitness, *** the focus shifts to the child.” See D.T., 212 Ill. 2d at 364 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.