Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2019The Court explained: “The Katz reasonable-expectations test ‘has been added to, not substituted for,’ the traditional property-based understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and so is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.” (Emphases in original.) Jardines, 569 U.S. at 11 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 409 ). 2018The Court explained: "The Katz reasonable-expectations test 'has been added to , not substituted for ,' the traditional property-based understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and so is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas." (Emphases in original.) Jardines , 569 U.S. at 11 , 133 S.Ct. 1409 (quoting Jones , 565 U.S. at 409 , 132 S.Ct. 945 ). | 3 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Florida v. Jardines
green
2 sentences2019The Court explained: “The Katz reasonable-expectations test ‘has been added to, not substituted for,’ the traditional property-based understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and so is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.” (Emphases in original.) Jardines, 569 U.S. at 11 (quoting Jones, 565 U.S. at 409 ). 2018The Court explained: "The Katz reasonable-expectations test 'has been added to , not substituted for ,' the traditional property-based understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and so is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas." (Emphases in original.) Jardines , 569 U.S. at 11 , 133 S.Ct. 1409 (quoting Jones , 565 U.S. at 409 , 132 S.Ct. 945 ). | 5 | 2015–2019 |
Kyllo v. United States
green
2 sentences2019Nor did the Court find it necessary to consider whether Kyllo, 533 U.S. 27 , applied because “when the government uses a physical intrusion to explore details of the home (including its curtilage), the antiquity of the tools that they bring along is irrelevant.” Jardines, 569 U.S. at 11 . 2018Nor did the Court find it necessary to consider whether Kyllo , 533 U.S. 27 , 121 S.Ct. 2038 , applied because "when the government uses a physical intrusion to explore details of the home (including its curtilage), the antiquity of the tools that they bring along is irrelevant." Jardines , 569 U.S. at 11 , 133 S.Ct. 1409 . | 5 | 2015–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.