Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Flory v. Weaver
neutral
1 sentence2010Flory, 196 Ill. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Yates
green
2 sentences1991People v. Yates (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 502, 533 , 456 N.E.2d 1369 . 1991People v. Yates (1983), 98 Ill. 2d 502, 533 , 456 N.E.2d 1369 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Hudson
green
1 sentence1991App. 3d 606 , 484 N.E.2d 1246 .) In addition the record must show that the jury verdict may have resulted from the error before plain error can be considered as a means of circumventing the waiver rule. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Baker
neutral
1 sentence1980App. 3d 240 , 402 N.E.2d 662 .) Nor can plain error be asserted as a means of circumventing this rule unless it is clear from the record that an error affecting substantial rights was committed. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Whooper
neutral
2 sentences1980App. 3d 1079, 1083 , 398 N.E.2d 93, 96 .) “Nor will plain error be considered as a means of circumventing this rule unless it is clear from the record that an error affecting substantial rights was committed.” (Emphasis added.) 78 Ill. 1980App. 3d 1079, 1083 , 398 N.E.2d 93, 96 .) “Nor will plain error be considered as a means of circumventing this rule unless it is clear from the record that an error affecting substantial rights was committed.” (Emphasis added.) 78 Ill. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Pickett
green
2 sentences1979(People v. Pickett (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 .) Nor will plain error be considered as a means of circumventing this rule unless it is clear from the record that an error affecting substantial rights was committed. 1979(People v. Pickett (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 .) Nor will plain error be considered as a means of circumventing this rule unless it is clear from the record that an error affecting substantial rights was committed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Precup
green
1 sentence1979(People v. Precup (1978), 72 Ill. 2d 7 , 382 N.E.2d 227 .) Upon review of this record we find no such error, nor do we find any actual conflict between the defendant and his co-defendant. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.