Mendoza motion (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Mendoza motion in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Winsettgreen
ill · 1992 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Winsett, 153 Ill.2d at 341 , 180 Ill.Dec. 109 , 606 N.E.2d 1186 .

2006See Winsett, 153 Ill.2d at 341 , 180 Ill.Dec. 109 , 606 N.E.2d 1186 .

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Strickland v. Washington green
scotus · 1984
1 sentence

2019At sentencing, Mendoza’s counsel stated that, after Mendoza’s arrest and at counsel’s behest, Mendoza had obtained legal driving privileges, “for possible mitigation.” The trial court sentenced Mendoza to two years’ probation, along with 480 hours of community service. ¶ 13 Analysis ¶ 14 Mendoza argues this court should reverse his conviction and remand for a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress Mendoza’s statement to Officer -4- No. 1-18-0008 Hunt that he did not have a driver’s license and for failing to object to the admission of Mendoza’s driv

12019–2019
People v. Mendoza green
illappct · 1992
1 sentence

1993Mendoza, 234 Ill.

11993–1993
Uphaus v. Wyman green
scotus · 1959
1 sentence

1978Ed. 2d 1090 , 79 S. Ct. 1040 .) Nor was Mendoza’s claim here that Ayala could alibi for Mendoza a sufficient additional circumstance so as to permit Ayala’s arrest.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1996–2022) CA 17 (2005–2025) WA 7 (1999–2014) NV 6 (2016–2020) IL 5 (1978–2019) FL 4 (2000–2018) NE 4 (1999–2020) WY 2 (2013–2016) KS 2 (2021–2025) AK 2 (1994–1995) AZ 2 (2009–2019) NY 2 (1980–2024) GA 2 (2020–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check