Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barbara Streit v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurangreen1 sentence2020Burress-Taylor v. American Security Insurance Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 110554 , ¶ 5. ¶ 70 “The Illinois Standard Fire Policy sets a minimum threshold for what fire-insurance policies must cover ***.” Streit v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company, 863 F.3d 770, 771 (2017) (interpreting Illinois law). ¶ 71 As in Burress-Taylor, Meza complains that the court erred because the court could have found that there was a material issue of fact about when the limitation period for a lawsuit ended under the policy and the endorsement. | 1 | 1 |
American Access Casualty Co. v. Tutsongreen2 sentences2012See American Access, 409 Ill. 2012American Access, 409 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trinity Bible Baptist Church v. Federal Kemper Insurance
green
2 sentences2011Trinity Bible Baptist Church, 219 Ill. 2004Trinity Bible Baptist Church, 219 Ill. | 3 | 2004–2011 |
Burress-Taylor v. American Security Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2020Burress-Taylor v. American Security Insurance Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 110554 , ¶ 5. ¶ 70 “The Illinois Standard Fire Policy sets a minimum threshold for what fire-insurance policies must cover ***.” Streit v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company, 863 F.3d 770, 771 (2017) (interpreting Illinois law). ¶ 71 As in Burress-Taylor, Meza complains that the court erred because the court could have found that there was a material issue of fact about when the limitation period for a lawsuit ended under the policy and the endorsement. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.