Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
General Casualty Insurance v. Laceygreen2 sentences2015General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199 Ill. 2d 281, 284 (2002). ¶ 29 Based on our de novo review of the record, we are mindful that Krier did not file a counter-affidavit in opposition to PNC’s motion for summary judgment. 2015General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199 Ill. 2d 281, 284 (2002). ¶ 29 Based on our de novo review of the record, we are mindful that Krier did not file a counteraffidavit in opposition to PNC’s motion for summary judgment. | 2 | 2 |
Beauchamp v. Dartgreen1 sentence2022Beauchamp v. Dart, 2022 IL App (1st) 210091, ¶ 8 (a plaintiff is required to have pled facts that are sufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted to survive a motion to dismiss). | 1 | 1 |
Steadfast Insurance Co. v. Caremark Rx, Inc.green1 sentence2020“A party cannot seek summary judgment on a theory that was never pled in the complaint.” Steadfast Insurance Co. v. Caremark Rx, Inc., 373 Ill. App. 3d 895, 900 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Palaciosgreen1 sentence2015See Bank of America, N.A. v. Land, 2013 IL App (5th) 120283, ¶ 17 (“ ‘The mere suggestion that a genuine issue of material fact exists without supporting documentation does not create an issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.’ ” (quoting In re Marriage of Palacios, 275 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
US Bank v. Avdicgreen2 sentences2015See Avdic, 2014 IL App (1st) 121759, ¶ 32 (upholding a circuit court order awarding summary judgment to a bank in foreclosure action where the bank’s filings contained sufficient evidence to establish its case that the mortgagor had defaulted on his mortgage obligations and the mortgagor failed to file any competent evidence to rebut the bank’s claims). ¶ 24 We further find that the additional orders entered by the circuit court after granting PNC’s motion for summary judgment, including the judgment of foreclosure and sale of the property and an order of possession, were also proper. 2015See Avdic, 2014 IL App (1st) 121759, ¶ 32 (upholding a circuit court order awarding summary judgment to a bank in foreclosure action where the bank’s filings contained sufficient evidence to establish its case that the mortgagor had defaulted on his mortgage obligations and the mortgagor failed to file any competent evidence to rebut the bank’s claims). ¶ 24 We further find that the additional orders entered by the circuit court after granting PNC’s motion for summary judgment, including the judgment of foreclosure and sale of the property and an order of possession, were also proper. | 1 | 1 |
Bank of America, N.A. v. Landgreen1 sentence2015See Bank of America, N.A. v. Land, 2013 IL App (5th) 120283, ¶ 17 (“ ‘The mere suggestion that a genuine issue of material fact exists without supporting documentation does not create an issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.’ ” (quoting In re Marriage of Palacios, 275 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. McCluskey
green
2 sentences2015McCluskey, 2013 IL 115469, ¶ 25 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Snick, 2011 IL App (3d) 100436, ¶ 11 . ¶ 38 In this case, Krier’s motion to vacate the judgment was filed on March 19, 2014, after the completion of the judicial sale on March 13, 2014, and the filing of PNC’s motion to confirm the sale on March 14, 2014. 2015McCluskey, 2013 IL 115469, ¶ 25 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Snick, 2011 IL App (3d) 100436, ¶ 11 . ¶ 38 In this case, Krier’s motion to vacate the judgment was filed on March 19, 2014, after the completion of the judicial sale on March 13, 2014, and the filing of PNC’s motion to confirm the sale on March 14, 2014. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Deutsche Bank National Trust v. Snick
green
2 sentences2015McCluskey, 2013 IL 115469, ¶ 25 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Snick, 2011 IL App (3d) 100436, ¶ 11 . ¶ 38 In this case, Krier’s motion to vacate the judgment was filed on March 19, 2014, after the completion of the judicial sale on March 13, 2014, and the filing of PNC’s motion to confirm the sale on March 14, 2014. 2015McCluskey, 2013 IL 115469, ¶ 25 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Snick, 2011 IL App (3d) 100436, ¶ 11 . ¶ 38 In this case, Krier’s motion to vacate the judgment was filed on March 19, 2014, after the completion of the judicial sale on March 13, 2014, and the filing of PNC’s motion to confirm the sale on March 14, 2014. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.