Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. 1996 HONDA ACCORDgreen2 sentences2011(West 2002)) without a preseizure hearing), and People v. 1996 Honda Accord, 404 Ill.App.3d 174, 175 , 343 Ill.Dec. 928 , 935 N.E.2d 1156 (2d Dist. 2010) (held that similar provisions of the Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act (725 ILCS 150/1 et seq. 2011(West 2002)) without a preseizure hearing), and People v. 1996 Honda Accord, 404 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars
green
2 sentences2010Ed. 2d 143 , 150 n.12, 103 S. Ct. 2005 , 2011 n.12 (1983), for the proposition that the government may seize property subject to forfeiture without a preseizure hearing. 2010United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars ($8,850) in United States Currency, 461 U.S. 555 , 562 n.12, 76 L. | 3 | 2010–2010 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2010In $8,850, the Supreme Court, after noting that a preseizure hearing was not required, applied the four-part test from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L. 2010In $8,850, the Supreme Court, after noting that a preseizure hearing was not required, applied the four-part test from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 33 L. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2010Ed. 2d at 32 , 96 S. Ct. at 902 ), the government may seize property subject to forfeiture without a preseizure hearing. 2010Ed. 2d at 32 , 96 S. Ct. at 902 ), the government may seize property subject to forfeiture without a preseizure hearing. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.