Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Chicago Flood Litigationgreen1 sentence2020In re Chicago Flood Litigation, 176 Ill. 2d 179, 198-99 (1997); Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co., 91 Ill. 2d 69, 84 (1982). ¶ 25 Plaintiffs argue that this case is not an “economic loss” case because the damages for the cost of the screenings are not “economic losses” as defined in Moorman—i.e., “ ‘damages for inadequate value, costs of repair and replacement of the defective product, or consequent loss of profits—without any claim of personal injury or damage to other property ***’ [citation] as well as ‘the diminution in -8- the value of the product because it is inferior in qu | 1 | 1 |
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.green2 sentences2020In re Chicago Flood Litigation, 176 Ill. 2d 179, 198-99 (1997); Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co., 91 Ill. 2d 69, 84 (1982). ¶ 25 Plaintiffs argue that this case is not an “economic loss” case because the damages for the cost of the screenings are not “economic losses” as defined in Moorman—i.e., “ ‘damages for inadequate value, costs of repair and replacement of the defective product, or consequent loss of profits—without any claim of personal injury or damage to other property ***’ [citation] as well as ‘the diminution in -8- the value of the product because it is inferior in qu 2020In re Chicago Flood Litigation, 176 Ill. 2d 179, 198-99 (1997); Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co., 91 Ill. 2d 69, 84 (1982). ¶ 25 Plaintiffs argue that this case is not an “economic loss” case because the damages for the cost of the screenings are not “economic losses” as defined in Moorman—i.e., “ ‘damages for inadequate value, costs of repair and replacement of the defective product, or consequent loss of profits—without any claim of personal injury or damage to other property ***’ [citation] as well as ‘the diminution in -8- the value of the product because it is inferior in qu | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People Ex Rel. Miller v. Fullenwider
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 72-73 (citing Newman v. United States ex rel. 2017Id. at 72-73 (citing Newman v. United States ex rel. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Thomas v. Hinsdale
neutral
1 sentence1916But the more prevalent rule is that the attachment defendant has a right of action not based upon the bond, but sounding in tort for an attachment merely wrongful. ’ ’ In Thomas v. Hinsdale, 78 Ill. 259 , it was held the defendant in attachment who had been wrongfully complained against might sue on the attachment bond or bring an action in trespass. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Keats v. Hugo
green
1 sentence1893The prevalent rule in the United States is, that an easement in the unobstructed passage of light over an adjoining close cannot be acquired by prescription. (2 Woodfall’s Land. & Ten. marg. page 703 and notes; 1 Taylor’s Land. & Ten. secs. 239, 380, and notes; Keats v. Hugo, 115 Mass. 204 ; Mullen v. Stricker, 19 Ohio St. 135 ). | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Gerber v. Grabel
neutral
1 sentence1893In the early case of Gerber v. Grabel, 16 Ill. 217 , this court held that such a right might be so acquired, but in the later case of Guest v. Reynolds, 68 Ill. 478 , the Gerber case was, in effect, overruled; and it was held, that “a prescriptive right, springing up under the narrow limitation in the English law, to prevent obstructions to window lights” “cannot be applied to the growing cities and villages of this country without working the most mischievous consequences, and has never been deemed a part of our law.” It is established by the weight of American authority, that a grant of the | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Guest v. Reynolds
green
1 sentence1893In the early case of Gerber v. Grabel, 16 Ill. 217 , this court held that such a right might be so acquired, but in the later case of Guest v. Reynolds, 68 Ill. 478 , the Gerber case was, in effect, overruled; and it was held, that “a prescriptive right, springing up under the narrow limitation in the English law, to prevent obstructions to window lights” “cannot be applied to the growing cities and villages of this country without working the most mischievous consequences, and has never been deemed a part of our law.” It is established by the weight of American authority, that a grant of the | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.