recipient after hearing (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

recipient after hearing in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Quickgreen
illappct · 1992 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2020–2026
2 sentences

2026The court observed that “[a]n out-of-court statement used for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted may be admissible to show the state of mind of the recipient after hearing the statement.” Id.

2020People v. Quick, 236 Ill. App. 3d 446, 453 (1992).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Perez green
illappct · 1991
1 sentence

1992(Perez, 209 Ill.

11992–1992
People v. Davis green
illappct · 1984
1 sentence

1991People v. Davis (1984), 130 Ill.

11991–1991
People v. Cooper green
illappct · 1981
2 sentences

1984App. 3d 222 , 422 N.E.2d 885 , cert. denied (1982), 455 U.S. 945 , 71 L.

1984Such statements may be used to show state of mind of the recipient after hearing the statement (People v. Cooper (1981), 97 Ill.

11984–1984
Connecticut v. Smith green
scotus · 1982
1 sentence

1984App. 3d 222 , 422 N.E.2d 885 , cert. denied (1982), 455 U.S. 945 , 71 L.

11984–1984
East Coast Tender Service, Inc. v. Duty green
scotus · 1982
1 sentence

1984App. 3d 222 , 422 N.E.2d 885 , cert. denied (1982), 455 U.S. 945 , 71 L.

11984–1984

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check