Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MacNeil v. Trambertgreen2 sentences2023If no evidentiary hearing has been held: “A plaintiff has the burden of establishing a prima facie case for jurisdiction when seeking jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. [Citation.] *** A reviewing court addressing a challenge to personal jurisdiction must resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits [citation]; however, a plaintiff’s prima facie case for jurisdiction can be overcome by a defendant’s uncontroverted evidence that defeats jurisdiction. [Citation.] If we decide that a plaintiff has made a prima facie case for jurisdiction over a defendant 2021In such a case, the method of our review has been stated as follows: “A plaintiff has the burden of establishing a prima facie case for jurisdiction when seeking jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. [Citation.] *** A reviewing court addressing a challenge to personal jurisdiction must resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits [citation]; however, a plaintiff’s prima facie case 7 for jurisdiction can be overcome by a defendant’s uncontroverted evidence that defeats jurisdiction. [Citation.] If we decide that a plaintiff has made a prima facie case for | 3 | 3 |
Liaquat Khan v. Van Remmen, Inc.green2 sentences2010A reviewing court addressing a challenge to personal jurisdiction must resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits ( Khan v. Van Remmen, Inc., 325 Ill.App.3d 49, 56 , 258 Ill. 2010A reviewing court addressing a challenge to personal jurisdiction must resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits ( Khan v. Van Remmen, Inc., 325 Ill.App.3d 49, 56 , 258 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
AASONN, LLC v. Delaney
green
2 sentences2021App. 3d 1077, 1080 (2010). ¶ 20 “Illinois courts may assert personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant only if the assertion comports with section 2-209 of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-209 (West 2010)), known as Illinois’ long-arm statute, and with the due process guarantees of both the Illinois and the United States Constitutions.” Aasonn, LLC v. Delaney, 2011 IL App (2d) 101125, ¶ 11 . 1 The details of a proper analysis of these components of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant were stated by the Aasonn court as follows: “Prior to the enactment in 1989 of the ‘catch-all prov 2021In such a case, the method of our review has been stated as follows: “A plaintiff has the burden of establishing a prima facie case for jurisdiction when seeking jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. [Citation.] *** A reviewing court addressing a challenge to personal jurisdiction must resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits [citation]; however, a plaintiff’s prima facie case for jurisdiction can be overcome by a defendant’s uncontroverted evidence that defeats jurisdiction. [Citation.] If we decide that a plaintiff has made a prima facie case for j | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Cori v. Schlafly
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.