scaffold defense (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

scaffold defense in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Rangel v. Brookhaven Constructors, Inc. green
illappct · 1999
2 sentences

2014Rangel, 307 Ill.

2014Rangel, 307 Ill.

32013–2014
Gannon v. Commonwealth Edison Co. neutral
illappct · 1989
1 sentence

1991This court considered an analogous situation in Gannon v. Commonwealth Edison Co. (1989), 182 Ill.

11991–1991
Tenenbaum v. City of Chicago green
ill · 1975
2 sentences

1984(Tenenbaum v. City of Chicago (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 363 , 325 N.E.2d 607 .) It is also clear that failure to provide a scaffold is no defense to liability under the act where a scaffold is necessary for the proper and adequate protection of life and limb.

1984(Tenenbaum v. City of Chicago (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 363 , 325 N.E.2d 607 .) It is also clear that failure to provide a scaffold is no defense to liability under the act where a scaffold is necessary for the proper and adequate protection of life and limb.

11984–1984
Louis v. Barenfanger green
ill · 1968
2 sentences

1984(Louis v. Barenfanger (1968), 39 Ill. 2d 445 , 236 N.E.2d 724 .) In reviewing the facts as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, we are compelled to agree with the circuit court, that is, the floor was being used as a floor, not a scaffold, and the defendant did not fail to provide a scaffold where one was necessary.

1984(Louis v. Barenfanger (1968), 39 Ill. 2d 445 , 236 N.E.2d 724 .) In reviewing the facts as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, we are compelled to agree with the circuit court, that is, the floor was being used as a floor, not a scaffold, and the defendant did not fail to provide a scaffold where one was necessary.

11984–1984

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 (3) USC § 29u.s.c.651 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 5 (1984–2014) CA 2 (2021–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check