Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bankgreen2 sentences2014The purpose behind the enactment of TILA was “to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit, and to protect the consumer against inaccurate and unfair credit billing and credit card practices.” 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (a) (2006); see Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank, 523 U.S. 410, 412 (1998). ¶ 19 To aid in the understanding and application of TILA, the Federal Reserve Board was vested with the power to implement regulations regarding TILA. 2014The purpose behind the enactment of TILA was “to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms so that the consumer will be able to compare more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the uninformed use of credit, and to protect the consumer against inaccurate and unfair credit billing and credit card practices.” 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (a) (2006); see Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank, 523 U.S. 410, 412 (1998). ¶ 19 To aid in the understanding and application of TILA, the Federal Reserve Board was vested with the power to implement regulations regarding TILA. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Al-Par, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021Under the present statutory and regulatory framework, count III should have been decided in Tom’s favor as a matter of law. ¶ 69 Lynn Plaza’s reliance on this court’s decision in Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Al-Par, Inc., 183 Ill. 2021Under the present statutory and regulatory framework, count III should have been decided in Tom’s favor as a matter of law. ¶ 69 Lynn Plaza’s reliance on this court’s decision in Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Al-Par, Inc., 183 Ill. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Department of Revenue
green
1 sentence2012The party challenging the validity of a statute has the burden of clearly establishing a constitutional violation.” Id. ¶ 18 I. ¶ 19 The Statutory and Regulatory Framework of the Act ¶ 20 We begin our analysis of the constitutionality of the Act by first outlining the statutory and regulatory framework of the Act. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.