unqualified privilege (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

unqualified privilege in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1881–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Foggy green
ill · 1988
1 sentence

2025Second, the Foggy court expressly considered the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Ritchie and determined that the unqualified privilege created by the Code was an “issue unresolved by Ritchie.” Foggy, 121 Ill. 2d at 347 .

12025–2025
People v. Valderama neutral
illappct · 2025
1 sentence

2025Therefore, we reject defendant’s argument that Sauls is applicable here. - 15 - 2025 IL App (2d) 240574 ¶ 46 III.

12025–2025
Schott v. Glover green
illappct · 1982
2 sentences

1991App. 3d 230 , 440 N.E.2d 376 .) An unqualified privilege can be overcome by showing actual malice to harm a third party.

1991(Schott v. Glover (1982), 109 Ill.

11991–1991
BD. OF TRUSTEES OF JR. COLLEGE DIST. v. Webb neutral
illappct · 1974
1 sentence

1981App. 3d 183 , 185, 321 N.E.2d 127 .) We hold that, as it applies to applicants seeking employment as regular duty firemen in Illinois municipalities, the present unqualified bar against amputees is unconstitutional under article I, section 19 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970.

11981–1981
City of Chicago v. Roth neutral
ill · 1929
1 sentence

1930With the exception of City of Chicago v. Roth, 334 Ill. 132 , not one of these cases purports to construe the Local Improvement Act of 1897, which we are here required to construe.

11930–1930
Baker v. . Drake green
ny · 1873
1 sentence

1881J., delivering the opinion of the court, said that he was persuaded that the unqualified rule giving the plaintiff in all cases the highest value to time of trial could not be upheld upon any sound principle of reason or justice, and that the qualification of the rule that the action must be commenced within a reasonable time and prosecuted with diligence, did not relieve it of its objectionable character; and in the case of Baker v. Drake, 53 N. Y. 211 , the statement of Chief Justice Church was approved, and the rule of damages in Markham v. Jaudon repudiated.

11881–1881

Where else courts name it

CA 28 (1911–2026) NY 10 (1840–2012) TX 9 (1938–2017) MI 7 (1965–2022) WA 6 (1905–1997) KY 6 (2022–2026) PA 6 (1955–2013) OK 5 (1912–2013) IN 5 (1983–2017) IL 5 (1881–2025) MS 5 (1939–2022) CO 5 (1912–1990) MD 5 (1888–1991) WI 4 (1905–2025) FL 4 (1958–2008) NC 4 (1912–1974) MT 4 (1952–2018) OH 4 (1896–2024) OR 3 (1959–2026) LA 3 (1973–2015) MA 3 (1958–2006) KS 3 (1911–2009) IA 2 (1902–1955) MO 2 (1907–1959) ME 2 (1972–1977) MN 2 (1872–1966) WV 2 (1952–1998) DC 2 (1983–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check