wide spectrum defense (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

wide spectrum defense in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1978–1998 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Hillenbrandgreen
ill · 1988 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998
2 sentences

1998People v. Guest , 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores , 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand , 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) ("[m]istakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent"); People v. Madej , 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

1998People v. Guest, 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores, 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand, 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) (“Mistakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent”); People v. Madej, 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

44
People v. Madejgreen
ill · 1985 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998
2 sentences

1998People v. Guest , 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores , 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand , 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) ("[m]istakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent"); People v. Madej , 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

1998People v. Guest, 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores, 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand, 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) (“Mistakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent”); People v. Madej, 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

44
People v. Guestgreen
ill · 1995 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998
2 sentences

1998People v. Guest , 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores , 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand , 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) ("[m]istakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent"); People v. Madej , 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

1998People v. Guest, 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores, 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand, 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) (“Mistakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent”); People v. Madej, 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

44
People v. Floresgreen
ill · 1989 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998
2 sentences

1998People v. Guest , 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores , 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand , 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) ("[m]istakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent"); People v. Madej , 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

1998People v. Guest, 166 Ill. 2d 381, 394 (1995); Flores, 128 Ill. 2d at 106 ; People v. Hillenbrand, 121 Ill. 2d 537, 548 (1988) (“Mistakes in trial strategy or tactics or in judgment do not of themselves render the representation incompetent”); People v. Madej, 106 Ill. 2d 201, 214 (1985).

24

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Collins v. Collins neutral
illappct · 1977
1 sentence

1978App. 3d 35 ; see also cases collected in Annot., 57 A.L.R.3d 475 , 491-95 (1974).) Instead, the court should, in light of its own experience, consider a wide spectrum of factors in determining attorney fees: the ° ° skill and standing of the attorney employed, the nature of the cause, and the novelty and difficulty of the questions at issue; the amount and importance of the subject matter; the degree of responsibility involved in the management of the cause; the time and labor required; the usual and customary charge in the community; and the benefits resulting to the client.” (Collins v. Coll

11978–1978

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check