Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Norton v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Norton v. State, 772 N.E.2d 1028, 1033 (Ind. Ct. App. 7 Ind. Code § 31-17-2-21 (c) provides: “The court shall not hear evidence on a matter occurring before the last custody proceeding between the parties unless the matter relates to a change in the factors relating to the best interests of the child as described by section 8 and, if applicable, section 8.5 of this chapter.” Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A04-1409-DR-445 | June 9, 2015 Page 20 of 22 2002), trans. denied. 2013Norton v. State, 772 N.E.2d 1028, 1033 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. denied. | 3 | 3 |
Stanage v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Stanage v. State, 674 N.E.2d 214, 216 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. State
green
1 sentence2001Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |