Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Haig v. Agee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haig v. Agee Anchor | green | “matters intimately related to foreign policy and national security are rarely proper subjects for judicial intervention.” | 30 |
| 2 | United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. | green | “the president is the sole organ of the nation in its external relations, and its sole representative with foreign nations.” | 6 |
| 3 | Hwang, Geum Joo v. Japan | green | “that judicial intrusion into the relations between japan and other foreign governments would impinge upon the ability of the president to conduct the foreign relations of the united states.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.