Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Kansas City, Mo. v. Yarco Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Kansas City, Mo. v. Yarco Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “federal courts have an independent duty to determine subject matter jurisdiction, even where the matter is raised for the first time on appeal and on the court's own motion” | 13 |
| 2 | Tom Magee v. Benjamin Harris | green | “the burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction” | 12 |
| 3 | Tom Magee v. Benjamin Harris | green | “burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.