Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from CONNECTU LLC v. Zuckerberg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTU LLC v. Zuckerberg Anchor | green | “complete diversity of citizenship as between all plaintiffs and all defendants.” | 19 |
| 2 | Alvarez-Torres v. Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc. | green | “diversity jurisdiction does not exist where any plaintiff is a citizen of the same state as any defendant.” | 10 |
| 3 | CONNECTU LLC v. Zuckerberg | green | “where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of 75,000 . . . and is between citizens of different states.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.