Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Kevin Eugene Wright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Kevin Eugene Wright Anchor | green | “we do not weigh the evidence, assess the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute our judgment for that of the jury.” | 16 |
| 2 | United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) and Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433) | green | “attacks on witness credibility are simple challenges to the quality of the government's evidence and not the sufficiency of the evidence.” | 13 |
| 3 | United States v. Kevin Eugene Wright | green | “in cases in which we assess the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not weigh the evidence, assess the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute our judgment for that of the jury.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.