Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Miller, William G..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Miller, William G. Anchor | green | “the district court's power to disqualify an attorney derives from its inherent authority to supervise the professional conduct of attorneys appearing before it.” | 14 |
| 2 | Cohen v. Oasin | green | “vague and unsupported allegations are not sufficient to meet this standard.” | 6 |
| 3 | The Republic Of The Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation | green | “a district court must ensure that there is an adequate factual predicate for flexing its substantial muscle under its inherent powers” | 4 |
| 4 | Brice v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. | green | “disqualification is never automatic.” | 4 |
| 5 | Cohen v. Oasin | green | “clearly show that continued representation would be impermissible.” | 3 |
| 6 | Brice v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. | green | “the policy that attorneys be free to practice without excessive restrictions.” | 3 |
| 7 | Rohm and Haas Co. v. American Cyanamid Co. | green | “the essence of this analysis is whether the party seeking disqualification appears to use the disqualification motion as a tactical maneuver.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.