Topic: when reviewing a district court's pretrial order on a motio… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #10144

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Gauster.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Gauster Anchor
minn · 2008
green “when reviewing a district court's pretrial order on a motion to suppress evidence, we review the district court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard and the district court's legal determinations de novo.” 20
2 State v. Diede
minn · 2011
green “findings of fact are clearly erroneous if, on the entire evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” 7
3 State v. Diede
minn · 2011
green “we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” 5
4 State v. Klamar
minnctapp · 2012
green “deference must be given to the district court's credibility determinations.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check