Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fisk v. Barnhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fisk v. Barnhart Anchor | green | “and when an alj considers all of a claimant's impairments in the remaining steps of the disability determination, an alj's failure to find additional severe impairments at step two 'does not constitute reversible error.” | 20 |
| 2 | Jerome MAZIARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee | green | “and when an alj considers all of a claimant's impairments in the remaining steps of the disability determination, an alj's failure to find additional severe impairments at step two 'does not constitute reversible error.” | 10 |
| 3 | Fisk v. Barnhart | green | “when an alj considers all of a claimant's impairments in the remaining steps of the disability determination, an alj's failure to find additional severe impairments at step two 'does not constitute reversible error.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.