Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kathy Lyster v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kathy Lyster v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc. Anchor | green | “any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration, whether the problem at hand is the construction of the contract language itself or an allegation of waiver, delay, or a like defense to arbitrability.” | 9 |
| 2 | Pro Tech Industries, Inc., D/B/A Fusion Seal Corporation v. Urs Corporation, D/B/A Urs Group, Inc. American Home Assurance Company | green | “limited to determining (1) whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists and, if it does, (2) whether the agreement encompasses the dispute.” | 8 |
| 3 | Major v. McCallister | green | “apply traditional principles of contract law and focus on whether the plaintiff had reasonable notice of and manifested assent to the online agreement.” | 7 |
| 4 | Pro Tech Industries, Inc., D/B/A Fusion Seal Corporation v. Urs Corporation, D/B/A Urs Group, Inc. American Home Assurance Company | green | “court's role under the faa is therefore limited to determining (1) whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists and, if it does, (2) whether the agreement encompasses the dispute.” | 5 |
| 5 | Gracie Foster v. Walmart, Inc. | green | “a matter of contract,' meaning that disputes are arbitrable only to the extent an agreement between the parties says so.” | 5 |
| 6 | Pro Tech Industries, Inc., D/B/A Fusion Seal Corporation v. Urs Corporation, D/B/A Urs Group, Inc. American Home Assurance Company | green | “a court's role under the faa is . . . limited to determining (1) whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists and, if it does, (2) whether the agreement encompasses the dispute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.