Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from R² Investments, LDC v. Charter Communications, Inc. (In Re Charter Communications, Inc.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R² Investments, LDC v. Charter Communications, Inc. (In Re Charter Communications, Inc.) Anchor | green | “generally in bankruptcy appeals, the district court reviews the bankruptcy court's factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo.” | 21 |
| 2 | R² Investments, LDC v. Charter Communications, Inc. (In Re Charter Communications, Inc.) | green | “in bankruptcy appeals, the district court reviews the bankruptcy court's factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo.” | 8 |
| 3 | Bay Harbour Management, L.C. v. Lehman Bros. Holdings (In Re Lehman Bros. Holdings) | green | “the party that seeks to overturn them bears a heavy burden.” | 4 |
| 4 | Surety Administrators, Inc. v. Guadalupe (In Re Guadalupe) | green | “a finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.