Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Central Lumber Co. v. Duhon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central Lumber Co. v. Duhon Anchor | green | “great deference is accorded to the workers' compensation judge's factual findings and reasonable evaluations of credibility.” | 13 |
| 2 | Nash v. AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP. | neutral | “a workers' compensation claimant is entitled to an increase in attorney fees to reflect additional time incurred in defending an employer/insurer's unsuccessful appeal.” | 11 |
| 3 | Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp. | green | “the purpose of imposition of penalties and attorney fees is to discourage indifference and undesirable conduct by employers and insurers.” | 5 |
| 4 | Romero v. Northrop-Grumman | green | “to avoid the imposition of penalties and attorney fees for the nonpayment of benefits, the employer has a continuing obligation to investigate, to assemble, and to assess factual information before denying benefits.” | 4 |
| 5 | Green v. NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO | green | “the determination of coverage is a subjective one in that each case must be decided from all of its particular facts.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.